Archive for June, 2013
What’s the Reality with Agenda 21? Part 3
But the vagueness and broadness of the order is the problem. As one individual notes, “it establishes unchecked federal control into rural America in education, food supply, land use, water use, recreation, property, energy, and the lives of 16% of the U.S. population.”
What’s the Reality with Agenda 21? Part 2
When we are talking about our federal government and their cooperation with the UN, we need to be concerned. Anytime America (or any country for that matter), joins with the UN on some treaty or program, the danger is losing some of its sovereignty. This happens because America voluntarily places itself under the authority of that treaty or program directed by the UN. This would be the same with the Arms Trade Treaty if Obama (or any future president) signs onto it with the UN.
What’s the Reality with Agenda 21? Part 1
To help us understand what “sustainable development” is, we can learn what it is not. “Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paves and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.”
Download Our Latest Book – Falling Away – Free
Political correctness has been creating a foundation of Cultural Marxism into American society for decades. This phenomenon began in earnest as the 1950s turned into the 1960s, which gave birth to the cultural revolution. As our society moved from one decade to the next, the changes that took place framed the way people thought, acted, and lived.
Continued Disgrace of the “Knockout Game”
Those from the black community who enjoy beating the crap out of white people simply because they are white often do so as if it’s a game. To them it may be a game, but to their victims, it can often end up being deadly. It’s called the “Knockout Game.”
Professor Christopher Swindell Should Be the Marxist of the Year!
What boggles my mind is that these leftists actually believe what they’re doing is the correct way to handle things like this. Did they sit the poor kid down at a table in a darkened room with a bright light shining in his face? Were there two teachers playing good cop, bad cop with the kid until he “confessed” about the “real” reason he brought the toy gun to school?
