New York Right to Life Clarifies AB6221

March 30, 2015 at 8:21 AM

The procedure shown is one in which the baby is "stabbed" through the head during late-term abortions.

The procedure shown is one in which the baby is “stabbed” through the head during late-term abortions.

I had written to the folks at New York State Right to Life asking them specifics about AB6221. A woman named Jessica was kind enough to provide me with the requested information and also clarification about the New York Assembly Bill 6221. Since AB6221 is fairly short, it simply references previous bills that are already law.

The following information is provided as a means of clarifying what AB6221 will do, if it passes NY’s Senate as it has passed NY’s Assembly.

AB 6221 would enshrine third trimester abortion into NY state law. Right now NY law does not allow for third trimester abortion except to save the life of the mother, and they are not currently being performed in New York state (as far as we know. For example see the Jennifer Morbelli case where she had to go to MD for a late abortion). That would change if this law passed. In a state that is already the abortion capital of the country, expanding third trimester abortion is the very last thing we need.

In essence then, AB6221 is designed to shore up potential problems that would occur should Roe v. Wade is ever overturned. It would allow non-doctors (like midwives, nurses, and physicians assistants) to perform abortions and it would extend the “health” exception into the third-trimester, where this is not now current.

In essence then, the state of New York wants to ensure that should Roe v. Wade become overturned at any point, they will already have laws in place that effectively replace it in New York state.

I am going to write an article very soon on the various methods of abortion used in the United States. I can use a refresher on this subject and it may also help to educate people who are really unaware of the methods that are used and during which trimester they are normally associated.

Frankly, as readers will note (and as many already are aware), there is no “safe” or “painless” way to kill an unborn human being. The fact that it happens so often with so many women repeating the process is proof that, for many, abortion-on-demand is a means of “contraception” or “birth control.” While I find any and all abortions appalling, I can understand that a young girl who becomes pregnant via rape (which is an extremely low percentage) would have an abortion. Depending upon the age of the “mother,” she herself may be in a terrible position health wise if she doesn’t have an abortion. Nonetheless, the child is still be killed.

Statistics have proven that many abortions are repeats. In 2012, 1.2 million women had abortions, and “the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that more than 44 percent of these were repeat abortions, and 1 in 5 represent a third or even higher order abortion.” There truly is no excuse for this except laziness. In spite of contraceptives being available over the counter or via prescription (condoms to pills), it seems that either these contraceptive methods are either not being used according to directions, they’re not being used at all, or they have a higher failure rate than anyone is letting on.

If 44% of women having abortions are having repeat abortions, something is seriously wrong. Out of 1.2 million abortions in one year alone, roughly 600,000 abortions are performed on women who have already had at least one abortion.

Folks, those who value life and understand that human beings were made in God’s image understand that this should not be. Yet, it is and we need to ask why? Is it so that the “rights” of women to murder their unborn child remain intact or is it something worse?

Anytime an abortion happens, even when it truly involves saving the life of the mother, it is not a good thing. Frankly, I would hate to be the physician who has to make that decision about either aborting the child to save the life of the mother or the reverse.

Nonetheless, it is also clear that the liberal lawmakers in the state of New York want to ensure that under no circumstances (including the reversal of Roe v. Wade), will women ever have to worry about losing the “right” to kill their unborn human child. This is why AB6221 exists and those who support it desperately want it to become law.

My understanding is that it will have a very difficult time passing NY’s Senate. Like those who want to ban ammo and guns, we can be assured that they will not give up if the bill loses in the senate. They will simply regroup, reword, and try again.

Entry filed under: christianity, Religious - Christian - End Times, Religious - Christian - Prophecy, Religious - Christian - Theology. Tags: , , , , .

Meaning of “Day of the Lord” Part 2 Abortion Methods Used in United States


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 6,177 other followers

Our Books on Amazon

Study-Grow-Know Archives

Blog Stats

  • 752,996 hits

%d bloggers like this: