How Does the Christian Actively Love?

October 12, 2012 at 11:59 AM 3 comments

This question has been on my mind for some time now and I’ve been trying to wrap my brain around it.  We can all quote Scripture and when we consider a topic like this, most of us have our favorite verses that we immediately go to for reference, solace, or confirmation.

Here’s the problem though, as far as I can tell.  Most people when they think of what it means to be a Christian, they think in terms of a list.  That list comprises things that a person is allowed to do and that same list highlights things that a Christian is not supposed to do.  It’s natural to think in those terms.

Yet, if we stopped there, we would be only partially correct and to be only partially correct is not 100% correct.  So what do we do?

I was reading an article about Kirk Cameron, who has most know, states that he is a Christian.  I’m not necessarily doubting that at all.  I’m simply relating what he has said about himself.

Apparently, while on the set and after he committed his life to Christ, he became rather demanding.  He wanted scripts to be rewritten so that a more accurate morality could be portrayed.  Beyond this, he also gave the cast and crew fits with his constant (seeming) condemnation of their lives, their faults, and their foibles.  Who really knows how true all of this is, however I have watched video interviews with some of the cast he worked with and they attest to the fact that it was difficult to work with him on the set because of his growing religious commitment.  Since I wasn’t there, it boils down to a “he said/they said” type of thing.  At the very least, it was probably somewhat uncomfortable for the rest of the cast and crew to deal with Kirk’s new found Christianity and if he did come across as judgmental, then that would only serve to make it even more uncomfortable at times.

I know that we Christians have a tendency to appear at the very least, off-putting and at the very worst, extremely judgmental.  It happens and it is likely due to the fact that we truly do not understand what it means to love other people.  We do so with reservations too often and I’ll admit that for myself as well.

It is at times so difficult to separate the sin from the sinner that at times, it’s easier to simply condemn the sin and the sinner winds up being condemned at the same time, or we love the sinner and appear to embrace their way of life as well.  For instance, one of the big issues today is homosexuality.  How does a Christian embrace the homosexual while at the same time, rejecting their lifestyle?  That is so difficult at best!

We have a friend who is in a lesbian relationship.  Quite frankly, I really like both of the women.  They are fun and quirky.  One of the best compliments I have ever received is that the one woman (that we have more contact with) has stated to us that she knows we do not agree with her lifestyle but she also knows how much we love her and care about her.  Wow!  Here I had been worrying that I was either being “too hard” or “not hard enough” and the reality was that all I needed to do was love her and her partner without condemnation.  Somehow, she gleaned from us that while we cannot support her lifestyle, we absolutely support her.  Honestly, I’m not sure how that happened.

I look back over my life as a Christian and I can see the times I have been very judgmental.  I was this way toward my sister years ago when she chose to live with a guy and I’m not sure her divorce had been finalized yet.  I was a Pharisee, to be sure.  Over the years, my sister and I fortunately became very close and her commitment to Jesus improved (likely no thanks to my attitude!).

One of the things I’m considering is this question:  do I – as a Christian – have the right to tell the world how to live?  Do I have the authority to tell non-Christians what they should and should not do?  Certainly, if we are talking about someone is at the very least professes to be a Christian, then because of that profession, they come under biblical authority and if they are part of a local church, the leaders of that church have the duty to come alongside that person and help them see their way clear of something in their life that is holding them back.  The problem of course, is that this has been used as a hammer to beat people over the head and the outcome has never been good at all.

As I said at the beginning, I’m really mulling (and praying) my way through this situation.  Ultimately, I want people to know me as a Christian and as someone who cares about them and their eternal welfare.  I want people to know that I love them and accept them as fellow human beings.  Should I even worry about their own tragedy of sin, since I myself am not perfect?

I’m certainly not trying to shirk my duties, but it seems to me that honestly loving people would go a good deal further than leaving with a sense of “you’ve been judged!” attitude.  I often wonder about Jesus and how willingly the small children would come up to Him.  Obviously, there was something about His personality that engendered that reaction.

Moreover, there was often a similar reaction in adults.  Of course, in Jesus’ day, propriety was something that was generally not ignored so it was more difficult for say, a woman, to simply come up to Jesus and start talking to Him.  I’m convinced that this is often why Jesus would begin a conversation, as He did with the woman at the well.  He actually broke convention by speaking to her because she was a Samaritan.  This was a person a “good” Jew would not communicate with unless they had to do so.

Jesus was good about reaching out to people.  He was also obviously very good and embracing them in spite of the sin in their lives.  He seemed to have no problem eating with “sinners” and tax collectors, yet if someone who says he is a Christian does this today, it is likely he would be looked down upon by other Christians.

I mentioned the fact that Christianity is often measured in the “to do” lists associated with it.  We should never do things that are considered bad and only do those things considered to be good.  We make our lists, we check them and we do our best to adhere to them.

In spite of this, we tell the world that Christianity is completely different from every other religion because essentially, being a Christian means being in a relationship with Jesus.  No other religion boasts this.

But, how is it that we live?  Do we Christians live as if we are actually in relationship with Jesus, or are we more focused on our “to do” list?

When I began to date my wife, I did not have a “to do” list.  I simply wanted to be with her all the time.  I wanted to make her happy.  After we married, I wanted to do the same thing and I still want to do that.  I do not equate my marriage to a “to do” list.  That would not only cheapen it, but redraw it completely.

My relationship with my wife is based on love and trust.  That is the focal point from which the relationship lives and breathes.  I don’t have this complex list of things that I should be doing for my wife as well as the things I should be avoiding where my wife is concerned.  I love her and react to her based on that concept.

In the process, I wind up doing things for her because I love her.  Conversely, there are things I also avoid doing for this same reason.  However, I guess the big difference is that I do not approach the relationship thinking of all the things I must do or avoid.  I simply live out the relationship with my wife.  Sometimes, things go well, and at other times, not so well.  But the focal point always remains the same.  It never varies.

As far as my Christianity is concerned, do I truly see myself in a relationship with Jesus, or is my Christianity defined by the rules I keep and the things I avoid?  If I see myself as being in relationship with Christ, then my motivation for doing some things while avoiding others stems from my deep appreciation for what He has done for me.  If, for the most part, my life is governed by a set of rules and regulations, then I am not really in relationship with Christ at all, but merely following a set of rules and regulations.

There once was a rich young ruler.  He had family and wealth.  He had learned what to do and what not to do from an early age.  As far as he could tell, he had spent his life obeying rules, the kind of rules that he thought would give him eternal life.

One day, this rich young ruler stood before Jesus to ask him a question.  The question had to do with what he must do to inherit eternal life.  Jesus talked to him about obeying the rules.  The young man answered that he had kept all the rules since he had been a boy.  The text next tells us that Jesus looked on the man and felt love him (cf. Mark 10:21).  I’m not exactly sure what that love felt like within Christ, but it prompted Him to say what He said next.

The second part of verse 21 tells us, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”  We learn that after he heard these words, the young man walked away greatly saddened, ostensibly because he could not part with his wealth.

Here is an example of someone who literally kept the rules, but it wasn’t good enough.  His heart wasn’t in the right place.  In fact, his heart was with his riches, in spite of the fact that if you had asked him, he would have told you that he loved God with all of his heart.

The Apostle Paul was another person who lived to follow the rules.  He was a pharisee of pharisees and lived it.  He knew the rules, backwards and forwards and obeyed them.  There was never a question about it.  He simply obeyed.

But it is also clear that this same Paul (Saul, before his conversion in Acts 9) did not love.  He could not willingly set aside rules because of a love he had for someone.  He could not ignore the rules.  He lived by them and would have died by them as well.

Jesus lived life by loving others.  It was His entire purpose.  Yes, he fulfilled the law by obeying as well.  However, He fulfilled the law out of love, not duty.  He wanted to fulfill the law because He knew it would give Him the opportunity to truly show how much He loves all people in this world!  So He did not merely obey the law because it was there.  He obeyed the law because it was the means to the end for Him; an end which set the captive free!

I think for the true Christian, it is a very, very difficult road to walk down.  On one hand, we are beset with our own sin and failures that we constantly struggle against.  These remind us of the reason why Jesus came to this earth during His first advent.  He came  to die.  We do not like how our own inner struggles make us feel and we seem to be constantly reminded of our own disobedience and rebellion.

On the other hand, we are here to present a loving God to a world that is in rebellion and on its way to hell.  There seem to be two extremes to this reality for Christians.  One extreme is like that of those in groups like Westboro Baptist Church.  They routinely protest gays and soldiers at their funerals.  They believe that God hates and because of that hatred, is angry all the time.  They believe the only ones who are saved from that hatred are the actual elect.

It is because of this belief that they have some of the most disrespectful signs displayed during their protests.  There is no need for me to point them out here as a simple search of the Internet will provide that information for those who are truly interested.

Is God like this?  Did Jesus act like this while He walked the earth?  While I do understand that God hates sin, His love compelled Him to die for the sinner.  I do not believe that God hates those who are involved in homosexuality, nor does He hate the soldier who dies in one of our wars.  God is not like the god promoted by the Westboro Baptist Church, nor is He like the god preached by the radical Islamist.

The other extreme seems to be those who profess to be Christians who never tell anyone else about Jesus because they believe that this in itself is a form of being judgmental.  At the same time, we have preachers who state that homosexuals go to heaven.  It seems to me that these people are more concerned about being accepted by men, than understanding the truth of God.

It also seems to me that by asking Christians what they think about specific issues, we are putting the cart before the horse, aren’t we?  I asked at the beginning of this article whether or not a Christian has the right to tell those in the world how to live.  Taken a step further, can those who do not have the empowering of the indwelling Holy Spirit even hope to break their addiction to their own personal sin (whatever it happens to be)?  How difficult is it for Christians to break the hold over sin, yet some expect those within the world to stop what is considered to be their aberrant behavior?  That’s a bit ridiculous, isn’t it?

In other words, it seems very natural that the world is going the way it is going because the majority of people are not saved.  Do we as Christians think they are going to be saved if we simply tell them what is wrong with their life, enumerating their sins for them?

Isn’t it better to approach it from another angle?  Instead of telling people that God hates homosexuality and because of it (and other sins), God’s wrath is being poured out onto this nation, blah, blah, blah, shouldn’t the message that Christians share today be the same message that Jesus shared roughly 2,000 years earlier?  Wasn’t that message simply that God loves us in spite of our sins, our faults, and our incompleteness?

I realize that we have to show people that they have fallen short of God’s glory.  That is what creates the need in the first place for people.  But to harp on their specific sins seems pointless to me.  I could be wrong, but it seems like we would fare better with the lost of this world if we would stop truncating the message that focuses on a person’s specific sins and simply point out (by our life as well as our words) that God loves them immensely.

A few years ago, my wife and I participated in a set of teaching lessons on evangelism.  The hosts of the DVD program indicated that “friendship evangelism” did not work, so they were advocating a more direct approach with street witnessing.

At the time, I agreed with them, but I’m not so sure.  Why can’t both aspects work?  I mean, for goodness sakes, God is the One who draws people to Himself anyway.  He has obviously done it using words, miracles, and nothing at all.  He is the One who controls the way a person finally sees and then embraces His truth.  We are merely farmers, planting a seed, watering it, or maybe being there for the harvest.  We have absolutely no control over how someone officially sees the truth.  God simply permits us to be part of the process, somewhere.  All glory goes to Him though, because if we choose not to be part of the process, He will use someone else (or nothing) to bring forth the fruit He desires to see.

I think I have been weighing myself down too much over the years.  I’m wondering if I simply need to let go and let God do what He will do in and through me?  That doesn’t mean I do nothing.  But it certainly may mean that I stop focusing on rules and start focusing on my relationship with Him.  That relationship is supposed to change me for the better, isn’t it?  In the meantime, the effects of that changing relationship should also mean that people will see something in me that lies beyond me and that something will draw them in, hopefully.

As you can tell, I have not found my way through all of this yet.  I’m going to trust God to help me get a really good handle on this so that I will in fact, understand that it is my relationship with Him that counts, not the rules or regulations I follow.  Will you join me in that prayer?  Thank you.

Entry filed under: 9/11, alienology, Atheism and religion, Communism, Demonic, dispensationalism, Eastern Mysticism, emergent church, Gun Control, Islam, Islamofascism, israel, Judaism, Life in America, Maitreya, new age movement, Posttribulational Rapture, Pretribulational Rapture, Radical Islam, rapture, Religious - Christian - End Times, Religious - Christian - Prophecy, Religious - Christian - Theology, salvation, Satanism, second coming, Sharia Law, Socialism, temple mount, Transhumanism, ufology. Tags: , , .

Apparently It’s Not Safe to Wear a “Romney” T-Shirt to School Second Presidential Debate…

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Sherry's avatar Sherry  |  October 28, 2012 at 8:52 PM

    Great post!

    Everytime I hear how fellow cast members thought Kirk Cameron was a bit obnoxious with his sharing of his newfound faith in Christ, it reminds me of me! It wasn’t for lack of knowing how to love others-it was because of it! I was so deeply grieved for their eternal state that I just had to do whatever to get them to “see:” their need for my Savior. I’m not sure when it happened but I realized that it wasn’t my job to convict a person of their sins, it was the job of the Holy Spirit. When Jesus witnessed to Nicodemus, He didn’t ask him if he ever lied, stole a paper clip from work or looked at a woman lustfully. He simply told him that he must be born again and patiently explained it as was asked of Him. Most people don’t understand that “born again” talk (or Jimmy Carter comes to mind with the oldsters), so I simply tell the one I’m witnessing to that I’m not near good enough to come before a most holy God like Jesus is so I need Him for that. This always is said after they tell me they are good enough people and worthy of heaven. I tell them that I have to have Jesus and that sometimes leads to the asking of why. Mostly, it leaves them speechless and after an awkward moment we find another topic to talk about (though I’m inwardly praying for their salvationthe whole while 🙂 ).

    I do admit that I want to grab these dear people whom I love and shake them and tell them that they have no idea what hell is like and not to gamble with their eternal souls and to come to Christ this very minute! They aren’t garanteed their next breath! 😯

    Yes, that is a prayer to pray for all of us who know Christ Jesus. No matter how deeply we love Him, we can ask for a deeper love for Him. You have my prayers and I thank you for yours~

    Like

    Reply
  • 2. Laura's avatar Laura  |  October 15, 2012 at 2:56 AM

    Islamic Jihad massacres, as hate crimes en-masse

    Every Islamic terror act, anywhere, is a clear cut case of intolerance. It is always against the “other.”

    True, by Islamic Jihad any infidel targets are fair-game. It’s just that some groups are easier targets than others, as “justification” are aided by propaganda, often backed by some radical liberals in the West. Such are many Muslim aggressors posing as “victims.” For instance, those Arab immigrants’ grandchildren, invaders in Jews’ Israel/Palestine who go by the title “Palestinians,” while some in the West really buy the notion that these mass-murderers (who hide behind civilians, to bring about casualties, to be used as trophies) are just about “Palestine-Arab-State,” ignoring or unaware of their real ethnic cleansing aims from the entire Holy Land.

    Ethno-religious hatred classics:

    Arab supremacy –derived from Koran, Koranic spirit and themes– especially resulting in enslaving Africans and Asians in the Arab world (often having the “inferior” non-Arabs as ‘sex-slaves’ as well) and the genocide in the Sudan (of already 3.5 million, since the 1950s) by a classic combination of Arab racism and Islamic Jihad. The same diabolical combination that “founded” (in the 1920s) the Arab Vs Israel “conflict,” by infamous Mufti who collaborated with the ultimate ‘racists’ – the WW2 Hitler/Nazis. Ever since, the ‘holy war’ against the Jews in the land has always been under the dual slogan of Allah Akbar and Itbach al-Yahud (AKA genocide). Leaving also behind, an inspired legacy of decades (and current) of ugly Nazi style cartoons in the hateful Arab press.

    The Armenian Genocide 1915-23, was both: Turkish ethnic supremacy and an overall holy war against Christians. The same goes to Turkish anti-Greek and anti-Assyrian genocide. Totaling a combined 2.7 million Christian victims.

    Ethno-Religious Moro-Muslims VS Philippines’ natives.

    Ethno-Religious Malay-Muslims VS Thai natives.

    Ethno-Religious Islamic-Hausa-Fulani VS Igbo Christians in Biafra Nigeria – 1960s-70s (3 million dead).
    Current (2011-13) Boko Haram Islamic mass-murder campaign in that country, deepens the Ethno-Religious divide.

    Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam Black-Muslim supremacy’s anti-White racism is deeply woven with radical Islamic vision. So were its linked Zebra murders in the 1970s and the Beltway snipers shootings in 2002.

    Ethno-Religious “pure-Muslim” Pakistani VS Bangladeshi (regarded as the impure) genocide – 1971 (3 million dead).

    Ethno-Religious “Palestinian” and Lebanese Muslims VS Christian Natives Maronites in Lebanon. 1970s-2000.

    Iran-Iraq war – 1980s (a million victims – at least). Racism (Arab supremacy vs Aryan-Iranians) and “we are the true Muslims” motivation, on both sides.

    Pakistani Sunnis and Shiites VS Ethno-Religious Ahmadis, resulting in mass violence. So is rampant anti-Ahmadi bigotry among “Palestinian” Arabs.

    Ethno-Religious Muslim-Uighur VS Han native Chinese. Terror attacks (not just against government but against ordinary Chinese too) recorded.

    Ethno-Religious Indonesian Muslims VS Chinese (1999 mass rape and murder) and VS native Catholics in E. Timor (200,000 victims).

    One of the ardent supporters and admirers of Osama bin Laden, who celebrated 9/11 massacre, the pan-Arab, pan-Islamic AEL (Arab European League) founded by Arab Lebanese, former Hezbollah D. A. Jahjah, has been accused of inciting racism and violence in Belgium.

    Ever since the bloody ‘Islamic theme of al-Aqsa’ intifada erupted (2000), Jews in Europe have been even an easier target to Islamic anti-Semitism, physical attacks and attempted ethnic cleansing. Such as by Arab/African Muslims in France; by Turkish/Iranian Muslims in Germany; by Arab-Muslims in the Benelux, Sweden and Norway. The kidnappers and torturers to death of Ilan Halimi to the sound of reciting the Koran (Paris, 2006) –for instance– were inspired by Hamas literature.
    The (2012) Toulouse school massacre by Mohamed Merah of the Islamic hate group ‘Forsane Alizza,’ (NYT reported Jan/23/12, that its site was laced with hate posting, it typically claimed to be “fighting Islamophobia,” and the DailyTelegraph reported Mar/23/12, that in Jan/12, “Forsane Alizza was banned in France for inciting racial hatred,”) made sure to mention those “Palestinians.”
    Likewise, Arabs in Latin America, have been targeting Jews.

    The Pakistani Jihadi Lashkar-e-Taiba (“Army of the Pure”) in Mumbai (2008), aided by the ISI (Pakistan Spy Agency) specifically targeted Whites, and even more so the Jews.

    Ethno-Religious Arab-Muslims VS native Coptic-Christians in Egypt, hate crimes still going on…

    Ethno-Religious (mostly separated by origin/ethnicity as well) Shiite VS Sunnis, and vice versa in Iraq (Zarqawi argued that ‘Shia were more dangerous than the “Zionists and Crusaders,”‘ Egyptian Cleric said -Mar/09- “Shiites are worse than Jews,”) and in Pakistan.
    Sunni Vs Alawites, Syria (al-Qaeda cleric’s Fatwa -Jul/12- calls Alawites, “greater infidels than the Christians and Jews”).
    Bloodshed going on, full force.
    A study about 2011 worldwide terror attacks -for example- found 70% of the (over 12,000) killings were perpetrated by Sunni Muslims. That includes: al-Qaeda, Taliban, and others.

    Last point but not least: most “conflicts” and bloodshed around the globe today ARE correlated to Islamism.

    Like

    Reply
  • 3. Deacon Dan aka Daniel Webster Lowell's avatar Deacon Dan aka Daniel Webster Lowell  |  October 14, 2012 at 3:44 AM

    Once again my paraphrase seems appropriate: Love God with all you got, love your fellows as you love yourself. I have found that keeping my focus on these two ‘rules’ forces everything else into God’s hands and I’m freed up even more to focus on these two rules.

    Keep It Simple Sinner, God’s not trying to trick you!

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to Deacon Dan aka Daniel Webster Lowell Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Our Books on Amazon

Version 1.0.0

Study-Grow-Know Archives

Blog Stats

  • 1,239,699 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 414 other subscribers
Follow StudyGrowKnow on WordPress.com