Black on White Crime is Essentially Non-Existent

April 11, 2013 at 9:01 PM 5 comments

When some groups of black youths get together to “party,” they play “The Knockout Game” or “Polar Bear Hunting,”[1] depending upon the area of the US the game is played.  The rules are simple.  Find one or two white people.  Come up to them and hit them as hard as possible.  Keep hitting until they’re out cold or you get tired.  The best way to “win” is by knocking your victim out with one hit.  Once they’re down, take whatever they have that you want and leave.  You can move onto your next victim, or just chill. Up to you. Dig? You feel me?

Colin Flaherty has been reporting on these types of crimes for a number of years.  He states, “America is in the midst of an epidemic of racial mob violence and the media refuses to report it.” [1]  When these crimes (black on white) are reported, usually elected officials, police, and the media downplay the event as if was just a bunch of kids horsing around. Oops, someone got hurt?  Darn.

Yet, there has been a steady parade of seemingly racially motivated muggings, beatings, rapes, thefts, and worse over the past few years at an alarming growth rate in major US cities, but we would hardly know it from the mainstream media.  Why does the media not report on this kind of thing?  When it does, why no mention of race?

This same media has no problem covering situations (and including race) when whites allegedly victimize blacks or other minorities.  We’ve all heard about those atrocious situations where whites attack blacks for no other reason than because of the color of skin.  (Need we be reminded just how desperate the media was to paint George Zimmerman a “white” person by labeling him a “white/Hispanic”?)

In Colin Flaherty’s book White Girl Bleed a Lot, he documents event after event (largely thanks to YouTube and other online venues), comparing what he sees in those videos to what newspapers or broadcast media news programs show (or many times, don’t show).  Amazing what the media will do for the benefit of certain groups.

But when there is white on black crime, the media has no problem highlighting race.  On a web page related to the James Craig Anderson tragic murder (white on black) and resultant court case, some of the comments underneath the story were eye-opening.  One poster stated, “whites need a fifteen percent surcharge on their sentences, because of all of the evil they have done, even though they had every advantage and opportunity.” [5]

Obviously, this person buys into the politically correct critical race theory that gave birth to the faulty white privilege.  This is the unproven belief that whites are born into privilege solely because they are born white and have all the advantages that allegedly come with it.  I’ll be ringing up David Rockefeller soon to collect my white privilege inheritance.

Colin Flaherty is white and he speaks about black on white crime.  Therefore, to many, he is simply a racist.  End of story.  Move on.

Flaherty has been on Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson’s show “BOND Action” and he agrees with Flaherty and even points to the growing racial tensions in his own book SCAM.  Peterson is considered an “Uncle Tom” by other blacks for deigning to call out blacks on this and other issues.

This is how the Left deals with truth they don’t like and those who spread it.  They label.  The redefine.  They castigate and demoralize.

I asked Colin why he thinks black on white crime is so under reported.  Colin responded, “I do not know the answer to your question. But here is the challenge people who are interested in this question face: Why try to explain something that lots of people believe does not exist?

“So the challenge is to move the conversation into a place where there is no longer any doubt we have a problem with black mob violence.

“A two-pronged problem: People who do it; and people who condone it.”

Like Colin, I’m at a loss to explain why these crimes of black mobs attacking whites are so under-reported.  Many are not reported at all.  The only thing I can think of is that it is one of the unwritten codes of political correctness, which strives to make “victims” look good while making “oppressors” look really bad.  According to political correctness, blacks are “victims” and whites are “aggressors.”

If the media started highlighting black on white crime, people might start to see the lie that is political correctness.  Is this the reason pointing out the race of white perpetrators is fine when it comes to racial violence, but not when the perpetrators are black against whites?  That certainly aligns with political correctness. But maybe there isn’t just one answer.  I need to do more research.

In the meantime, if you’re in for an eye-opener about the epidemic of black on white crime that is rarely reported, check out the link in the second footnote below.

We will revisit this…

If you would like to buy Colin Flaherty’s book, you can do so by clicking on the cover below:



[1] “Polar” references a white bear, and the target by groups of black youths is often a white person, hence the name “Polar Bear Hunting.”





Entry filed under: Political Correctness, Politically Correct, Politics, Racism. Tags: , , , .

Toomey and Manchin’s Flawed Background Check Margaret Sanger’s Racism, Pt. 2


  • 1. Jen  |  April 12, 2013 at 7:01 PM

    I really enjoyed this book. I started following Colin’s articles & was lead to another eye opening book that he kept referencing. It’s titled “The Un-Civil War: Blacks vs Ni**ers” and it’s written by a black guy named Starkes. Both books may be a positive sign of things to come in these turbulent times.

    • 2. modres  |  April 12, 2013 at 7:04 PM

      Glad I heard about Colin’s book. I will check out the book you mention by Starkes as well. I need as much information as possible to discuss this topic on my radio program. Thanks again.

      As I was searching for Starkes’ book, I came across this page:

      Apparently, they don’t agree with Starkes and – horror of horrors – believe that it’s the conservatives that are the problem! Man, who would have THOUGHT?

  • 3. Lester  |  April 12, 2013 at 7:26 AM

    I guess I’m really getting old. Growing up in Philly back in the 50’s we lived in a row house in Hunting Park. No one was privileged and many were just poor. No matter what color your skin was if it wasn’t green like a dollar you were out! As a teenager my dad moved to the outskirts of the city to work for a construction company. We had a house with no finished upstairs and 3 kids to contend with. Later being the oldest boy of 5, I was upstairs in the attic. No wall covering just insulation and a wire to hang what little clothes I had. Later in High school, you had to be in the college classes to be anybody and go to higher schooling. There was no free college on the east coast at that time. I wanted to go out for tennis but that was a college kid sport, so tough kid! Things have really changed since the 60’s. I guess the socialists have really done their job brainwashing all concerned or unconcerned! Will we ever wake up one day and realize we are all Americans and not ethnic groups thrown together in a war of skin color? Most African American people are mixed genetically with other American bloods! White Europeans are mixed with many other bloods also. I have many bloods in me and I’m white in winter and browned in Summer, LOL! All this is nothing new, the socialists and communists love to stir the people up and use them to their advantage. To me the enemy is the rich cats subjugating all people to suck the blood of all Americans no matter what color they are or ethnic and cultural background they are of. On and on it goes…….

    • 4. modres  |  April 12, 2013 at 7:31 AM

      That’s the problem with political correctness. It creates a fantasy land that never existed and pits one race against another and one gender against another. The fact that it also causes the media and others to NOT cover black on white crime is reprehensible.

      You’re right about the enemy.

    • 5. Sherry  |  April 12, 2013 at 6:31 PM

      Your comment reminded me of Dr. Sowell’s quote:

      “Those who automatically say that the social pathology of the ghetto is due to poverty, discrimination and the like cannot explain why such pathology was far less prevalent in the 1950s, when poverty and discrimination were worse. But there were not nearly as many grievance mongers and race hustlers then.”… THOMAS SOWELL

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7,713 other followers

Our Books on Amazon

Study-Grow-Know Archives

Blog Stats

  • 837,765 hits

%d bloggers like this: