Obviously, We Need to Outlaw Vampire Movies…

December 12, 2011 at 5:34 PM 4 comments

Vampires...the old fashioned kind.

It has become clear.  Whatever tries to hurt us we should outlaw.  Anti-gunners believe that guns kill people.  Actually, it’s the bullet that comes from the gun that does the damage.  Throwing a gun at someone is hardly likely to kill them though it could create a nasty gash.

In truth, while bullets do the physical damage that can bring on death, it’s the person who pulls the trigger who is what we would call “the killer.”  Anti-gunners make no distinction between using deadly force in self-defense and a criminal who simply kills someone in convenience, hatred, or severe anger.  To the anti-gunner, guns are bad all the way around and should be outlawed.

The efforts to make the magazines smaller that semi-automatic guns hold is underway.  Jarod Laughner had a gun that used magazines that held at least 10 rounds.  Certain Congressmen and women want magazines to hold no more than six rounds.  They say anything more is obviously used for “hunting people.”  That’s crap.  Tell that to men and women who enjoy shooting targets for practice.  Tell that to people who have become qualified marksmen because of their talent.

But still, the anti-gunner persists in wanting guns out of society.  They know the only way they can accomplish this is in degrees.  First, we make it difficult to buy guns by having a waiting period.  Then we add the requirement for gun safety classes.  Then they make it impossible to buy ammo online.  By the way, I don’t believe gun safety classes are wrong.  I believe they are actually good, however, it’s all merely a smoke screen because what anti-gunners really want (and won’t stop until they have it) is to have all handguns outlawed.

But there are a couple of things these anti-gunners don’t realize (what’s new?).  It doesn’t take much to create a zip gun that will fire a .22 bullet.  Charles Manson recently was found to be in possession of a bullet in jail…in California.  Why?  He was probably intending to create a homemade gun – a zip gun – that would fire one bullet at a time.  Why?  I’m assuming he was going to use it on another inmate or guard.  I seriously doubt he was going to try to take his own life.

So while anti-gunners believe that they will one day get their wish and have all handguns outlawed, they will still have to deal with long guns.  Yes, they are harder to conceal, which is why most criminals who prefer shotguns saw part of the barrel off.  You’ve seen “Terminator,” right?  Be cool and own a shotgun with a shortened barrel.  Easy to conceal, blows a bigger hole.  Still has a tremendous kick so the idea that a person can shoot it with one hand without it coming back and knocking a hole in your face and repositioning your nose is not something Hollywood cares to enact.  They’re not into realism.  Are they?

Tonight at the dinner table, we were talking about vampires and werewolves because I had read a short blurb about Breaking Dawn, from the Twilight series.  My son pointed out that when you go to a bookstore, there is a section for young people on Paranormal Teenage Drama, specifically vampires and werewolves.  Everyone is into it.  Why?  Because vampires and werewolves in today’s Hollywood have superior strength and cunning, along with their natural supernatural powers.  Who wouldn’t want that?

But it seems for some that the crossover from film to reality is not that difficult to make.  “A man claiming to be a vampire is in the Galveston County jail after attacking a woman over the weekend. “He was begging us to restrain him because he didn’t want to kill us,” Galveston Officer Daniel Erickson said. “He said he needed to feed.” [1]

The man – Lyle Monroe Bensley, 19, – “is being held on a charge of burglary with intent to commit assault after forcing his way early on Saturday into the apartment of a woman he did not know, police spokesman Capt. Jeff Heyse said.” [2]

Obviously, the guy is whacked, but did vampire movies and lore make him that way, or did it just find its way to the surface because of the proliferation of vampire movies and series like Twilight?

Do people become more prone to violence using guns because they are available in society or because movies have become so violent with the use of all manner of weaponry?

I’ve said this before, but it bears repeating.  Hollywood has stated in the past that they simply produced movies that reflected society.  I think that’s a deliberate lie.  I believe Hollywood has been trying to direct the course of society through the movies they make.

I believe society has become far more violent because of the level of realistic violence seen regularly in all sorts of films.  Society has also become desensitized to violence because it is seen repeatedly.  We not only see movies, but we see TV shows that capture actual assaults, car wrecks, deaths, suicides, and murders.  People are becoming so used to seeing violent images or the results of violence that they are far less likely to feel shock or distress over it.  We are becoming accustomed to it.  The old way TV/movies showed violence no longer works because it looks too fake.  In order to keep up, movies have to go way beyond it to create a realism that can be mistaken for reality, even though it’s not real.

So in spite of the fact that Hollywood is guilty of helping to create a society that is far more violent than when I was a kid and has created individuals who are no longer sensitive to violent acts, why aren’t we outlawing those types of movies?  Instead, we are trying to outlaw guns as if by doing so, people’s minds will somehow be converted to what life was like in the 1950s or before.  What?  There was plenty of violence there as well.

Years ago, when I was a kid, vampires were played by Bela Lugosi.  Frankenstein was portrayed by Boris Karloff.  Lon Chaney had his share of horror characters too.  Violence was usually implied and very little blood was shown.

This is most assuredly not the case today.  Blood is everywhere along with every foul word you can imagine.  Violence in many forms – verbal or physical being the most obvious – is constantly paraded across the minds of young people today.  Their minds are not yet finalized and are still very susceptible to suggestion and motif.

So obviously, some of them want to be vampires because apparently, that’s cool.  Well, is it?  I don’t think so.  The idea of biting people on the neck, sucking their blood and only being able to go out after the sun goes down does not appeal to me and it does not appeal to most of the world, at least as a profession.  However, more and more young people are finding “themselves” in this genre.  Their wishful thinking prompts them to reach beyond the pall of their own humanity into the fantasy world of the vampire or werewolf.  It is there that they find themselves and begin to believe that they are latent vampires or werewolves simply waiting for the right time to emerge from the shadows.

It is clear that these movies should be outlawed.  More than that, the people who want their canine teeth shaped to appear as though they are in fact vampires should be kept away from dentists.

When are people going to realize that society is what it is because of everything that influences it and most of that influence comes from Hollywood?  But the same people who want guns outlawed would never think of censoring the artist who brings the latest horror flick to the screen.  No, no, that would be taking away that license from that “artist” so they must allow them to wreak their havoc on society by presenting society with image after image of pain, torture, death and dismemberment…and vampires and werewolves.  It’s not their fault.  It’s the gun’s fault.  It’s the vampire teeth’s fault.  It simply cannot be the fault of the books and movies who push this stuff on young people of today.  No, the fault must be found someplace else.

Look folks, society is the experiment and few realize it.  We are on the receiving end of all sorts of images that are designed to direct our movements, our thoughts, and our outlook on life.  Of course that sounds conspiratorial, but it is only that if there is little chance that what I have just stated could be true.  If it’s true, it’s not conspiracy.  It’s reality of the worst kind.

[1] http://youbentmywookie.com/wtf/man-arrested-after-biting-woman-thinks-hes-a-500-year-old-vampire-13588

[2] Ibid

 

 

Entry filed under: 9/11, alienology, Atheism and religion, Communism, Demonic, dispensationalism, Eastern Mysticism, emergent church, Gun Control, Islam, Islamofascism, israel, Judaism, Life in America, Maitreya, new age movement, Posttribulational Rapture, Pretribulational Rapture, Radical Islam, rapture, Religious - Christian - End Times, Religious - Christian - Prophecy, Religious - Christian - Theology, salvation, Satanism, second coming, Sharia Law, Socialism, temple mount, Transhumanism, ufology. Tags: , , , .

Blaming “Whitey” and Bringing Jesus Back into the White House Buddhist Russell Simmons Buys Ads for “All-American Muslim”

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. abandonculture's avatar abandonculture  |  December 13, 2011 at 6:26 AM

    I feel the issue is not so much the portrayal of vampires but the way in which they are portrayed. Same goes for violence.

    In both cases what we see today is the normalisation of both. In today’s Hollywood movies and TV shows violence and vampirism (and magic, the occult etc) are seamlessly integrated into ordinary life, such as high school (think Buffy The Vampire Slayer).

    And along the way they are (naturally) dumbed down and transformed into extensions of consumer society. Because (naturally) everything has to conform to the values and ideals of a consumer society run by corporations….

    This begs the question ‘can fish in the ocean taste salt?’ Of course they can’t. Likewise when our culture is saturated with violence and vampirism (and many other things besides) it becomes impossible for most people to identify such things in real life (or rather, our reactions to them become numbed or subverted). Without (Hollywood style) violence and vampirism saturating entertainment (for nearly a century!) how might we react to today’s real life news stories depicting real life violence and vampirism?

    Because what is the entire elite banking / political establishment if not a bunch of violent vampires sucking the very life blood out of society, sucking out the resources, sucking out the wealth? What is ‘voting’ if not the invitation for them to cross the threshold into our lives? What is the media and PR if not the cloak of darkness in which they can operate – allowing them to avoid the harsh, burning light of public scrutiny? (of course the free internet has become a shaft of light in this respect).

    Might the very concept of vampirism have been defined in such a silly way in order that we can never apply it to the real world. The same goes for: violence, war and death. And let’s not forget the manner in which ‘conspiracy’ is defined by Hollywood too!

    This subject is discussed more in this video. I highly recommend it.

    Like

    Reply
    • 2. modres's avatar modres  |  December 13, 2011 at 2:35 PM

      Good points. Normally I don’t allow links to videos, etc., in responses, but I’ll make an exception with this one. Thanks.

      Like

      Reply
  • 3. Simon's avatar Simon  |  December 12, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    Other English-speaking countries (UK, Canada, NZ, Australia etc) are just as much influenced by Hollywood, and yet they have a fraction of the per capita gun-related violence. Why do you think that is? Violent movies and video games may make people have a greater tendency to violence (I don’t deny it) and should be more robustly censored. However, a violent-prone person is likely to do much more damage in the US than say in Australia because of the availability of guns.

    People do kill people, not just guns. However, killer-people who live in societies with easy access to guns tend to kill a hell of a lot more people. There will always be illegal weapons (e.g. organised crime), but it is far harder from an Aussie kid with adolocent issues to get hold of a fire arm to masacre half their class.

    if access to weapons wasn’t the problem, why all the concern about Iran and North Korea getting their hands of nuclear weapons? They are the collumbine kids of the world class of nations.

    Like

    Reply
    • 4. modres's avatar modres  |  December 13, 2011 at 6:04 AM

      Yes Simon, but guns are outlawed in the UK, Canada and other places. Yet, murders still occur, funny thing. Because guns are outlawed, that would explain the “fraction of the per capita gun-related violence.” Since it is next to impossible to obtain handguns, then it is equally impossible to use them in gun-related violence, correct?

      My point was simply that if the Federal gov’t succeeded in outlawing guns, the criminals would STILL get them. maybe you missed that point, Simon.

      Speaking of Columbine, you forgot to mention Norway in which guns are essentially outlawed. Yet, Anders Breivik managed to get one and wound up killing a lot of people. “Norway’s anti-gun hysteria resulted in laws restricting gun ownership by law-abiding citizens, leaving them exposed to gun violence at the hands of criminals such as Breivik, who simply ignore anti-gun ownership laws. Despite the Second Amendment, which protects American citizens’ rights to access to guns for self-protection, the Constitutional right of citizens to bear arms is under constant assault.” [1]

      In his best-selling classic “More Guns, Less Crime,” John R. Lott, Jr. has proven that guns make us safer. And in the book “The Bias against Guns,” he shows how liberals bury pro-gun facts out of sheer bias against the truth.

      ‘With irrefutable evidence, Lott shot down gun critics and provided information we need to win arguments with those fanatics who want to ban gun ownership, leaving criminals who ignore anti-gun ownership laws armed.” [2]

      It is a FACT that guns often make people safer! Too many individuals like yourself believe the opposite but that is a fairy tale. What the Federal gov’t tries to hide all the time is how many people are actually SAVED from death or injury because they are legally carrying a weapon that is used to save their life.

      Think what you want, Simon. I really get tired of arguing with you and I would think it would be the same for you, yet you continue to return here with your inane comments.

      [1] http://patriotupdate.com/articles/legal-guns-would-make-norway-safer
      [2] Ibid

      Like

      Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Our Books on Amazon

Version 1.0.0

Study-Grow-Know Archives

Blog Stats

  • 1,258,389 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 413 other subscribers
Follow StudyGrowKnow on WordPress.com